TGLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 18.98% compared to Tecnoglass's net margin of 4.14%. Tecnoglass's return on equity of 28.23% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.71%.

Tecnoglass has a consensus price target of $92.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tecnoglass has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Tecnoglass is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.844, which suggesting that the stock is 84.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.509, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.9%.

Tecnoglass has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Tecnoglass pays 12.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass quarterly revenues are $222.3M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $129.2M. Tecnoglass's net income of $42.2M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Tecnoglass's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass is 4.21x versus 0.26x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 18.98% compared to Tecnoglass's net margin of 2.78%. Tecnoglass's return on equity of 28.23% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Tecnoglass has a consensus price target of $92.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.53%. Given that Tecnoglass has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Tecnoglass is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.844, which suggesting that the stock is 84.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.302%.

Tecnoglass has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Tecnoglass pays 12.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Tecnoglass quarterly revenues are $222.3M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Tecnoglass's net income of $42.2M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Tecnoglass's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 28.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass is 4.21x versus 0.41x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 18.98% compared to Tecnoglass's net margin of --. Tecnoglass's return on equity of 28.23% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Tecnoglass has a consensus price target of $92.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 124.36%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Tecnoglass, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Tecnoglass.

Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.844, which suggesting that the stock is 84.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.978%.

Tecnoglass has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecnoglass pays 12.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass quarterly revenues are $222.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Tecnoglass's net income of $42.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Tecnoglass's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass is 4.21x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 18.98% compared to Tecnoglass's net margin of --. Tecnoglass's return on equity of 28.23% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Tecnoglass has a consensus price target of $92.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 120.59%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Tecnoglass, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Tecnoglass.

Tecnoglass has a beta of 1.844, which suggesting that the stock is 84.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.985%.

Tecnoglass has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecnoglass pays 12.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass quarterly revenues are $222.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Tecnoglass's net income of $42.2M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Tecnoglass's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass is 4.21x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.